Taxonomy Continued: The Too, Too Traditionalist Parent

Posted By on July 13, 2010

The diametric opposite of the Too, Too Progressive Parent is the Too, Too Traditionalist Parent.   Interestingly, the latter seem to have less of an internet presence than the former.  (My guess is that the Too, Too Traditionalist Parent is spending his or her time on talk radio as the preferred platform.)   I warned in advance that I’m less intimately acquainted with this breed, but when they do rear their heads on various forums they are as scary as their granola counterparts.

The “check the box” list of requirements for the Too, Too Traditionalist Parent:

  1. Parents follow doctors’ orders regarding labor, birth, vaccination, etc.
  2. The mother may breastfeed, but the nursing relationship will be from a few months to a maximum of one year, and it is a private affair.
  3. Baby sleeps in a crib from day one.
  4. Somewhere between four and six months, baby will be sleep trained with some form of “cry-it-out.”
  5. The parents circumcise their male children.
  6. The “rules of the house” are at least ten pages long, and enforcement (by means of time-out or otherwise) begins as early as possible.  Respect for the authority of adults is a must.
  7. Potty training happens miraculously and almost overnight.  Something called “potty bootcamp” is sometimes involved.
  8. An “indoor voice” is used everywhere — including outdoors.
  9. Gender expectations are reinforced early and often.
  10. The mother stays at home to parent her children full-time for the first several years at a minimum.

Again, plenty of room to agree or disagree on these practices, but when the practices are proclaimed with an air of superiority and absolutism then we’re moving into Too, Too territory.  The Too, Too Traditionalist Parent is often a capital-F Fundamentalist, and proud of it.

The following are the major logical fallacies upon which such a parent will rely when defending his or her own choices or attacking those of others:

  • A belief that what doesn’t kill you most certainly will make you stronger.  In other words, it’s best to prepare children early for the realities they will face in a harsh and unforgiving world.  (There’s a premise underlying this as well — that the world is an always shall be harsh and unforgiving.)
  • A literalist interpretation of The Bible as a parenting manual.   Once scripture is being bandied about, there’s no turning back to civilized dialogue with those who disagree.
  • A belief that things have “always” been done X way and that any proposed new approach is suspect, untested, and part of an agenda.   (An interesting one, since “always” rarely means all the way back to the noble caveman — that is ironically the jurisdiction of the Too, Too Progressive Parent.)

There’s your summary.   Take a look back and compare with the previous post for s–ts and giggles.   There are as many similarities as there are differences once you begin to peel back the onion.

Share

Related posts:

  1. Taxonomy Continued: The Too, Too Progressive Parent
  2. Taxonomy of the Too, Too Parent Class: Overview













About The Author

Comments

2 Responses to “Taxonomy Continued: The Too, Too Traditionalist Parent”

  1. Lauren says:

    The Bible is a manual for life, why wouldn’t I use it to raise my children?

    I think I understand your point that any extreme is dangerous, but extremes rarely exist, so this list is just a compilation of negative generalizations. It seems that you are attempting to typecast many different sets of people, but being offensive to everyone isn’t an excuse for being offensive in the first place.

    I didn’t really expect to fall into your traditionalist category: I natural birthed, am still nursing my almost 2-year old, and am experimenting with EC right now. But apparently respect for parents, celebrating my natural gifts as a woman and choosing to stay home to raise our kids places me firmly among the traditionalist (not to forget our belief in the Bible).

    Obviously I wasn’t here when you started this experiment, but I’m just not sure how this is helpful or healthy. It is your own blog, though, so you are free to follow your callings…

    [Reply]

  2. Daisy says:

    Really, Lauren, you’re exactly the sort of person that I think most of us are — a little of this, a little of that. I’m sure there are some people who would put you in the “attachment parenting progressive” basket based on some of your choices. But you don’t really fit into any bucket, do you? You parent your children as you deem best. Which is as it should be. I’ve nothing but respect for that.

    You’re right that my point is about extremes and rigid thinking within any camp, and I’ve noticed that the anonymity of the internet seems to foster that extremism so I am hoping for more open dialogue here.

    Your continued participation here (or a guest blog post if you’re interested) is welcome.

    Cheers,
    Daisy

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge

Subscribe without commenting